When it comes to daily trainers, it’s crucial to find the perfect balance between comfort, performance, and durability.
In this battle of the daily trainers, we’re pitting the Asics Noosa Tri 14 against the Evoride 3. These two shoes have a lot in common, yet they have distinct features that make each of them stand out.
Without further ado, let’s dive right into it…
Related:
Asics Gel Noosa Tri vs. Evoride
Let’s start with their stack height, which is a crucial factor in running shoes…
If you’re eager to know the winner of this battle:
- Asics Gel Noosa Tri 14: 8.5/10
- Asics Evoride 3: 7.5/10
Now let’s see where each shoe excels over the other…
Similarities in Stack Height and Midsole
Both the Noosa Tri 14 and the Evoride 3 Evoride 3 share the same stack height of 30mm in the heel and 25mm in the forefoot. They also feature the same FlyteFoam midsole, providing that essential cushioning.
Both models feature a new FlyteFoam, described by Asics as softer, and this is indeed the case. A comparison of the Noosa Tri 14 with the Tri 13 or the Evoride 3 with the Evoride 2 confirms that the midsoles are noticeably softer. This softer cushioning results in a more comfortable and less impactful running experience.
Midsole battle, we’ve got a tie:
- Asics Gel Noosa Tri 14: 8/10
- Asics Evoride 3: 8/10
Related:
Evolution from Predecessors
To understand the significance of these new models, it’s essential to compare them to their predecessors. The introduction of the new midsole foam has transformed the ride experience. The Noosa Tri 14 and the Evoride 3 have improved upon their predecessors, the Tri 13 and Evoride 2, respectively.
Related:
Guide Sole Technology
Both the Noosa Tri 14 and the Evoride 3 incorporate Asics’ Guide Sole technology. This technology, initially seen in the Metaride and GlideRide models, aims to prevent excessive ankle flexion and toe flexion with a rigid rocker geometry.
This feature enhances efficiency but used to make the ride prescriptive and somewhat rigid. However, in the latest models, the Guide Sole advantages are paired with added flexibility in the midsole, creating a more balanced and comfortable experience.
Ride and energy return battle, we’ve got a tie:
- Asics Gel Noosa Tri 14: 8/10
- Asics Evoride 3: 8/10
Related:
Weight Matters
When it comes to weight, the Noosa Tri 14 weighs in at 7.5 ounces (212 grams in a US 8.5), while the Evoride 3 is slightly lighter at 7.3 ounces (207 grams).
Interestingly, the Evoride 3 sheds a full ounce (28 grams) compared to its previous version, indicating a significant weight reduction. On the other hand, the Noosa Tri 14 doesn’t see such a substantial decrease, losing only a few tenths of an ounce.
Weight battle, the Noosa wins this round:
- Asics Gel Noosa Tri 14: 8.5/10
- Asics Evoride 3: 8.25/10
Related:
Outsole
The outsoles of the Tri and Evoride remain similar to their previous versions using durable AHAR+ rubber. However, the ride has become softer overall.
Outsole battle, we’ve got a tie:
- Asics Gel Noosa Tri 14: 8/10
- Asics Evoride 3: 8/10
Durability battle, the Noosa is slightly better:
- Asics Gel Noosa Tri 14: 7.75/10
- Asics Evoride 3: 7.5/10
Related:
Upper
In terms of upper construction, the Noosa Tri 14 has an advantage, with a gusseted tongue, a broader tongue, and a more secure fit through the midfoot.
The Evoride 3, on the other hand, opts for a thinner, stretchier upper material, offering a different experience that may not suit those with thicker forefeet.
In terms of the overall upper, the Noosa wins the second round:
- Asics Gel Noosa Tri 14: 9.5/10
- Asics Evoride 3: 8/10
Related:
Fit and Heel Counter
The Noosa Tri 14 features a higher, more secure heel counter and ditches the pull tab for a streamlined design. The Evoride 3, while similar to the Evoride 2 in terms of the heel counter, offers a more relaxed upper fit. The fit in the Noosa Tri 14 is geared towards a performance-oriented feel, while the Evoride 3 is a bit more comfort-oriented.
Fit battle, the Noosa wins this round:
- Asics Gel Noosa Tri 14: 8/10
- Asics Evoride 3: 7/10
Lockdown battle, the Noosa wins this round:
- Asics Gel Noosa Tri 14: 8.5/10
- Asics Evoride 3: 7.5/10
Related:
Comparative Insights
When looking at other models in the running shoe market, it’s clear that both the Noosa Tri 14 and the Evoride 3 have their unique characteristics.
Now, let’s see how the Noosa Tri and the Evoride compare to the Hoka Rincon, Skechers Razor Excess 2, and Adidas Adios 6.
The Hoka Rincon 3 boasts the highest stack height and the lightest weight at 7 ounces. The Skechers Razor Excess 2 closely matches the stack height of the Asics models but offers a stiffer ride with its carbon-infused H-shaped plate. The Adidas Adios 6, though a bit heavier, stands out with its stability features.
| Where to buy Noosa Tri (not affiliate) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Asics | Running Warehouse | |
| Where to buy Evoride (not affiliate) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Asics | Fleet Feet | |
Related:
The Verdict: A Clash of Comfort and Performance
Asics has improved the Guide Sole technology, making it friendlier and more practical by softening the midsoles and introducing some flexibility. Both the Noosa Tri 14 and Evoride 3 are versatile options, offering a five-millimeter drop and a balance between comfort and performance.
Comfort battle, we’ve got a tie:
- Asics Gel Noosa Tri 14: 7.75/10
- Asics Evoride 3: 7.75/10
In the end, it all comes down to your preferences and needs. The Noosa Tri 14 is a great choice for tempo runs and long runs, while the Evoride 3 leans more towards comfort-oriented training.
If the Noosa isn’t available in your size or preferred colorway, the Evoride 3 is a worthy alternative. However, in this daily trainer battle, the Noosa Tri 14 emerges as the winner, thanks to its superior upper and overall performance.
This pretty much wraps this Asics Gel Noosa Tri vs Evoride. I hope you’ve learned something new today and see you in the next one 🙂
