Great Nike Vaporfly Alternatives for Your Fastest Run Yet!


Hey there, fellow runner! I’ve gotta rave about the Nike Vaporfly – pure speed and performance magic. But hey, we’re all different, right? If you’re on the market for some interesting Nike Vaporfly alternatives, whether it’s a budget thing or the Vaporfly’s dance moves don’t sync with your foot mechanics, no worries – I’ve got you covered.

After a bit of digging, I’ve rounded up some cool alternatives. So, lace up – the road’s calling, and I’m ready to answer.


Nike Vaporfly Alternatives

My name’s Eric Barber, an avid runner whose enthusiasm for running shoes knows no bounds. Today, I’m excited to unveil what I consider to be the ultimate alternatives to the Nike Vaporfly.

On race day, you want to make sure you’ve got the best pair of shoes on your feet, ready to capitalize on those countless weeks and months of intense training. Now, if the Nike Vaporfly isn’t quite on your radar, for whatever reason you might have, the burning question becomes: which carbon-plated racer steps in to fill that void for you?


Nike Zoom Fly


Labeled as the “poor man’s Vaporfly,” the Nike Zoom Fly stands out as a compelling alternative to the pricier Nike Vaporfly, offering a balance of performance and affordability.

The Zoom Fly is now in its 5th iteration, but I still think the Zoom Fly 3 is the closest contender to the Vaporfly.

While it may not boast all the cutting-edge features of the Vaporfly, it still incorporates key technologies like a carbon fiber plate and React foam, providing a responsive and cushioned ride, impressive durability, and a touch more versatility.

The original Zoom Fly had Cushlon and a nylon plate, while its successor upgraded to React foam paired with a carbon fiber plate. With the third version, Nike stuck to the winning combo of React foam and a carbon fiber plate but threw in some upgraded geometries reminiscent of the Vaporfly.

Yet, let’s be honest – when you crave elite performance on that critical race day, the undeniable choice is the Nike Zoom Vapor Fly. It’s more cushioned, more responsive, and simply a superior shoe in every aspect.


Overall, the Zoom Fly is designed for runners seeking a high-performance racing experience without breaking the bank, making it an attractive choice for those who want a taste of elite-level innovation without the premium price tag.


Asics Metaspeed Sky+ & Metaspeed Edge+

Unlike most companies that are making one super shoe and a training companion, Asics has made two distinct super shoes for two distinct types of runners.

The Asics Metaspeed Sky+ and Metaspeed Edge+ emerge as compelling alternatives to the Nike Vaporfly, offering a distinctive focus on accommodating different running styles.

With specific designs tailored for stride and cadence runners, these Asics models showcase thoughtful design features like FF Turbo foam and carbon fiber plates, delivering a responsive and efficient racing experience.

The versatility of these shoes, combined with their emphasis on individualized runner needs, positions them as strong contenders for those seeking a noteworthy alternative for those seeking top-tier performance without solely leaning on the Vaporfly.

As a stride runner myself, the Metaspeed Sky+ resonates more with me compared to the Edge+. It’s not that the Edge+ is subpar; it just doesn’t sync with my running style.


Taking the Edge+ for marathon efforts, I felt like it just wasn’t as comfortable and I’ve discovered that I don’t really like aggressive rockered race shoes.

For my easy days or recovery runs, a rocker suits me just fine. However, when it’s time to lace up the race shoes, I’m realizing that I don’t. So, fellow runners sharing my sentiment, I would say look at the Metaspeed Sky+.

Now, let’s dissect the two types of runners that Asics has envisioned for these similar-looking yet very different shoes…

Stride Runners vs. Cadence Runners

Diving into the intricacies of running styles, Asics introduces the notion of two distinct runner profiles: stride runners and cadence runners.

To distinguish between the two, the key lies in observing the changes in your stride length as you push the pace. For everyone that’s out there, as you go faster, your stride length or the amount of distance you cover per foot strike increases.

But for stride runners, as you are going faster, your stride length increases much more than the stride length increases for cadence runners.

The other way to look at it is when you go faster, stride runners increase the length of their stride whereas cadence runners increase the number of strides that they take.

For Asics, this distinction is important because it dictates the specific shoe technologies needed for optimal performance for each runner type.

Now, with that kind of premise set in mind, let’s talk about how Asics tailors the Metaspeed Sky+ and Metaspeed Edge+ to align with the unique needs of these two distinct running styles…

Metaspeed Sky+ vs. Metaspeed Edge+

Both these shoes rock FF Turbo, Asics’ top-notch super foam. FF Turbo has a tendency to compress really quickly and spring back really quickly as well.

They share the same carbon fiber plate setup, but that’s pretty much where the similarities end, even though they might look alike.

When it comes to the uppers, it’s a case of déjà vu – they’re practically identical in fit, materials, and even the laces. The goal? Keeping your foot snug and secure during those race efforts. In terms of performance, these uppers quietly do a fantastic job.

Metaspeed Sky+


Now, let’s dive into the nitty-gritty – unlike the Metaspeed Edge+, the carbon fiber plate in the Sky+ sits high up, very close to your foot. Initially, I was skeptical; close-to-foot plates sound uncomfortable, right? Surprisingly, this setup was pretty comfortable for the type of runner I am.

Having that carbon fiber close to the ground, I feel like the carbon fiber engages the ground earlier, which means less potential squish. And if your footstrike is sloppy, there’s less potential squirrely wobbliness before that carbon fiber engages and also kind of levels out the impact forces, smoothing the ride.

Now, when that carbon fiber is further from the ground, you get more room for the shoe to squish. Sounds comfy, but it requires a cleaner footstrike in order for it to not feel unstable.

The late rocker also means there’s just more of a landing pad for you to land on for someone who’s a forefoot striker or a midfoot/forefoot striker, 

Sure, the upper might get a bit scratchy and has a tendency to crunch that pinky toe a little bit, but overall, it wraps around snug, giving that racer fit.


Summing it up, the Metaspeed Sky+ brings the goods. It has a really quick compression and decompression, plus a feedback system that lets you know when you’re killing it and when you need to tidy up your form.

Because of all those things, the Metaspeed Sky+ really suits me well in what I’m looking for from a race-day shoe when I’m trying to hit those fastest times in my marathons and half marathons, and for that reason, that’s why I’ve picked the Asics Metaspeed Sky+ as my carbon plated shoe of the year.


Metaspeed Edge+


The carbon fiber plate on the Edge+ is tilted very aggressively downward, minimizing the space between it and the ground. However, there’s more distance in terms of foam between the plate and your foot.

In combination with that very aggressive slope downward of the carbon fiber plate, the Edge+ throws in an early rocker. The rocker geometry that helps make that shoe kick up and that heel pickup as you’re rolling through that foot strike starts really early in the Metaspeed Edge and it’s very aggressive.

It’s something that I feel very prominently when I run in this shoe. All those things combine together to make it so that way it helps those cadence runners that need to turn over quickly in order to increase speed feel very snappy as they’re going through their gait cycle.

Adidas Adios Pro 3


With its refined design and innovative elements, the Adios Pro 3 emerges as a formidable choice for those in search of a high-performance racing shoe that aligns closely with the elite attributes of the Vaporfly.

The Adios Pro 3 has undergone a variety of little tweaks from top to bottom, making it the ultimate long-distance shoe in Adidas’ lineup.

I think the Adios Pro 3 slightly outshines its predecessor, the Adios Pro 2. I think it was a pretty tough thing to do from Adidas because the Adios Pro 2 was one of my favorite racing shoes. The main difference is that they’ve changed where the landing pad is on this shoe.

See, the Pro 2 had a touch of the Alphafly vibe, with the landing pad sitting a bit further back. The Pro 3, however, has tweaked this, altering the way my foot naturally lands. It’s pushing me more towards a midfoot strike, creating a smoother and more fluid roll through each step.

Surprisingly, I’m enjoying this sensation, despite the fact that I tend to prefer shoes where I am landing right at the pads of those feet and like basically on the toes.


Another noteworthy tweak is the rocker geometry – it’s a bit more gradual in the Pro 3 compared to the Pro 2. The result? A smoother foot strike, seamlessly transitioning from Lite Strike Pro to the carbon, allowing for a powerful push-off that gives me a satisfying pop at the end of each stride. It’s these subtle adjustments that elevate the Adios Pro 3 to a whole new level.

Lite Strike vs Zoom X vs FF Turbo

The thing that is still the same from the Adios Pro 2 to the Adios Pro 3 is there’s that dependable Lite Strike Pro, which is hands down one of my favorite super foams.

It’s very different from the other foams that are out there like the FF Turbo in the Metaspeed Sky+ and the Zoom X that’s in the Vaporfly in that it doesn’t quite squish as quickly or rebound quite as quickly.

Lite Strike doesn’t just absorb impact; it does so gracefully and snaps back really quickly. This unique sensation was fantastic at marathon effort and really sang for those threshold effort miles.

Yet, here’s the nuance – it can be a tad twitchy. The Adios Pro 3 is ultra-sensitive to how your foot connects with the ground and the precision of your mechanics.

I’ve noticed a distinctly positive response when I really focus on clean running mechanics. However, as fatigue sets in and things get a bit sloppy, the Adios Pro 3, in a way, holds me accountable. It’s like a gentle reminder – stay sharp or face the consequences.

Saucony Endorphin Pro 3


First off, here’s our detailed comparison of the Saucony Endorphin Pro 3 vs Endorphin Speed 3.

Distinguished by its refined design and notable enhancements, the Saucony Endorphin Pro 3 emerges as a strong alternative to the Nike Vaporfly for those seeking a high-performance racing shoe.

In the initial two years, Saucony has really struggled with the Endorphin Pro line. Versions one and two were exciting, no doubt, but I always found them a tad too firm for the marathon distance.

Throughout those first years, I engaged in numerous half marathon races and extensive marathon workouts, hitting those marathon paces and threshold races, but never the full 26.2 distance.

Enter the Pro 3, and it feels like Saucony listened. There’s more foam in that forefoot and they’ve softened this overall just a little bit to give it what I need out of a shoe, which is a bit of squish, a rapid response, and that satisfying stiff carbon plate sensation that lets me know I’m loading the carbon just right, yielding a pop with every step.


The Endorphin Pro 3 delivers on all three fronts.

Now, let’s talk about Saucony’s forte – their uppers. They’ve nailed it with a fantastic fit that’s both comfortable to wear and maintains that snug racer feel.

So, the Pro 3 is a shoe that I’ve really been enjoying and I had such a good time with it. So the Pro 3 finally becomes a marathon shoe.

ON Cloudboom Echo 3


Should the Vaporfly not quite click for you, the ON Cloudboom Echo 3 is another noteworthy alternative to the Nike Vaporfly, offering a blend of innovation and speed for competitive runners. But hold up, it’s not a wallet-friendly alternative to the Vaporfly; in fact, it comes with an even higher price tag.

But hear me out – ON has cooked up a legit top-tier super shoe here, and it’s a blast to race in.

I love everything about the Helion HF foam – it brings the right blend of fun and speed. That carbon fiber plate adds a sweet touch of stiffness without making the shoe feel like you’re running on concrete.

In many ways, the Cloudboom is similar to the Nike Vaporfly 3. It’s probably a little bit firmer than the Vaporfly, but it’s laser-focused on taking you through those speedy runs, much more than its earlier versions.



Now, here’s where it gets interesting – that rocker feeling is pretty pronounced. More so than the Vaporfly, thanks to the standout forefoot toe spring. It does feel great for just ticking over at those slower race paces, and hey, I even took it for a spin in a 5K race and it proved good for that as well when you’re going all out over those short distances.

What’s making all this happen? It’s the ON Helion HF, the carbon fiber plate, the rocker geometry, and those mini clouds working together. They’re the secret sauce for that propulsion and bounce you crave on race day.


The upper looks fantastic, fits great, and you’ve got that Swiss engineering charm in both function and form.

There’s not much padding around the heel cup and not a ton of structure either. It’s not floppy, but there’s a bit of vertical structure to scoop over the back of the heel. Just something to keep in mind.

Where it shines

I’ve been absolutely enjoying the Cloudboom Echo 3 during my workouts, especially those quarter-mile or 400-meter repeats at 5K effort. The way the foam and that carbon fiber plate work in this shoe feels powerful.

While I believe it can handle the marathon distance, to me, it screams half marathon racing – ideal for many non-elite runners.

Despite starting with a 37-millimeter stack height, the Cloudboom Echo 3 feels surprisingly close to the ground. Thanks to the carbon fiber plate, it maintains a relatively stable compression when you’re moving all that foam with every foot strike.

Even though it might look like I’m squishing the shoe with each step, it’s not a squishy experience. It’s more of a shoe with a solid pop. Every time I hit the ground, I’m bouncing right back up, making it feel incredibly fast.

Here’s the unique twist – those little grippy silicone slots on the insole, running perpendicular to the shoe, are designed to keep the sock from sliding around too much. Trust me, they come in handy, especially when things get wet and slippery.

Talking about sweat…



The upper fit was spot-on, just what you’d expect from an ON shoe. However, I noticed it leans a bit towards the less breathable side compared to the Vaporfly.

During my runs, I felt the sweat accumulating at the bottom, and the shoe’s movement through the air couldn’t quite shake off all that extra moisture. It left the shoe feeling a bit damp and soggy, making me wish for better ventilation.

When it comes to grip, especially during those threshold repeats on the treadmill, my sweaty feet caused a bit of slipping. Despite that, I had an overall fantastic experience with this exhilarating and speedy shoe.

The major letdown came with the outsole durability…



Now, the Cloudboom Echo 3 could pull double duty as a solid workout shoe, but here’s the kicker – the shoe box boldly states a projected lifespan of four marathons, a bit shorter than the usual expectation for race shoes these days.

I reached out to ON for more insight, and they confirmed that they’re confident the Cloudboom Echo 3 will remain race-ready for those first four marathons. Beyond that, they expect a gradual decline in performance, especially in factors like the energy return of the foam.

This shoe sits on the shorter end of the durability spectrum, and ON’s stance is clear – it’s a shoe reserved for your race day. They’re not picturing it as your go-to for a bunch of workouts and races. It’s meant to be your secret weapon, saved for those crucial race moments.

Despite the durability considerations, I had a blast running in the ON Cloudboom Echo 3. It’s undeniably fast and incredibly exciting, and I truly believe it can handle the marathon distance for efficient runners out there.


In conclusion, the search for Nike Vaporfly alternatives reveals a diverse landscape of high-performance racing shoes, each with its unique strengths and innovations.

Whether it’s the Asics Metaspeed series catering to different running styles, the Adidas Adios Pro 3 with its refined design, the Saucony Endorphin Pro 3 offering a balance of comfort and efficiency, or the ON Cloudboom Echo 3 providing a blend of innovation and speed, runners now have a variety of elite-level options to suit their preferences.

These alternatives not only showcase advancements in technology but also address specific runner needs, affirming that the world of racing shoes continues to evolve, offering exciting choices beyond the Vaporfly.

About Eric Barber

Eric Barber is a happy father of two little angels, a husband, and a runner. He eats, sleeps, and dreams anything foot related: running shoes, walking shoes, sneakers, you name it. It all started when Eric was a shoe store specialist watching and fitting people's feet day in and day out.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.