In today’s comparison, I’m going to embark on a comprehensive exploration of two iconic running shoe lines, the Nike Vomero vs. Pegasus.
I’m going to take you through what makes the latest editions Vomero 17 and Pegasus 40 exceptional choices, as well as the nuances that set them apart. It’s not just about pitting one against the other but understanding the unique strengths each franchise brings to the table.
Whether you’re aiming for speed, endurance, or a mix of both, I’ll highlight where each shoe shines and how they cater to different running preferences.
Finally, as the miles accumulate and the dust settles, I’m going to give you my personal verdict on which of these remarkable shoes deserves the crown in my running arsenal.
Make sure you check out our comprehensive comparison between the Nike Pegasus and Structure.
Nike Vomero vs Pegasus
Alright. Lace up tight, let’s hit the track, and discover whether it’s the plush comfort of the Vomero 17 or the versatile performance of the Pegasus 40 that claims victory in this head-to-head matchup.
First, let’s go over some specs…
Drop, Stack, Weight
Both the Vomero 17 and Pegasus 40 have a 10mm drop, but the Vomero boasts a higher stack height of 39mm at the heel and 29mm in the forefoot, while the Pegasus is at 33mm and 23mm, respectively.
Right away, you’ll notice the Vomero is more cushioned, a crucial point we’ll dive into later in the comparison.
When it comes to weight, the Vomero 17 clocks in at 10.1 oz (286g) for US men’s size 9 and 8.6 oz (244g) for women’s size 8. On the other hand, the Pegasus 40 is lighter, weighing 9.4 oz (266g) for men’s size 9 and 7.7 oz (218g) for women’s size 8.
In summary, the Pegasus 40 is less cushioned and slightly lighter, but the difference isn’t very noticeable when you’re wearing them.
Now, before delving into details about the midsole, upper, and outsole, let’s get straight to the point about what each shoe is designed for and where each one excels…
Where the Vomero and Pegasus Shine
In my experience, having covered plenty of ground with both the Nike Vomero 17 and the Nike Pegasus 40, I’ve gained a solid understanding of the distinct qualities each brings to the running shoe scene. Let me share my insights, shaped by numerous miles and workouts with both shoes.
The Pegasus 40 has become my reliable workhorse for daily training. It’s like the reliable Swiss army knife of running shoes – not the flashiest, but incredibly dependable.
With durability, a moderate weight, and a solid rubber outsole, the Pegasus stands out as my go-to for everyday runs. While it may not deliver the most thrilling ride, it’s the shoe I can consistently count on, taking it anywhere with confidence and trusting its performance without a second thought.
On the flip side, the Vomero 17 carves its own niche as a soft volume trainer, encouraging you to run easy and slow. While it’s still a little nimble underfoot, it doesn’t match the agility of the Pegasus, but it’s not as bulky as the Nike Invincible.
The Pegasus, with its slightly more agility and a touch of aggressiveness during toe-off, aligns better with my preference for a shoe that complements the active demands of my daily training. While the Vomero is comfortable, especially for easy runs, the Pegasus steals the spotlight with its versatility and reliability.
I love the Pegasus for its versatility, I’ve done a lot of long runs and workouts in it and I found it effortlessly transitions from long runs to workouts, offering a dynamic and adaptable experience. It’s just fantastic when a shoe can effortlessly handle different aspects of your running routine.
While the Pegasus can tackle long runs and workouts, it’s not always the ideal choice for easy day efforts because it encourages you to pick up the pace. This is where the Vomero 17 takes the spotlight, excelling in encouraging a slower, easier gait. It’s the go-to option when you want to take it easy and enjoy a comfortable cruise without feeling the push to amp up your speed.
The Vomero 17 finds its joy when you’re just rolling through miles, particularly during those long, slow, easy runs and conversational pace running. It’s the shoe that complements the slow, enjoyable moments of your run, making those extended outings a comfortable and pleasurable experience.
The Vomero does have a touch of nimbleness, allowing you to pick up the pace a bit, but it’s not in the same league as the Pegasus. It’s not exactly eager to go fast, and if you do decide to push the speed, it has a way of gently reminding you, “Are you sure you want to do this?”—a subtle nudge to stick to its comfort zone of easy and slow-paced runs.
The Pegasus brings a high level of flexibility to the table compared to the Vomero. This flexibility is something I personally appreciate in a daily trainer because it means my foot is actively engaged and working hard during those daily training miles rather than the shoe. It adds an extra layer of responsiveness and adaptability to the overall running experience.
In wrapping it up, if you’re in the market for a softer daily trainer, a bit more substantial than the Pegasus and perfect for those easy runs, then the Vomero 17 could be the perfect fit for you.
On the other hand, if nimbleness, versatility, and a dash of excitement in your daily runs are your priorities, I’d say the Pegasus 40 stands out as the superior choice, at least in my opinion.
Ultimately, it’s all about your running philosophy—whether you lean towards the consistent and agile shoe or the comfortable cruiser for those long, easy miles. Choose the one that aligns with your preferences, and you’re sure to enjoy every stride.
Vomero vs Pegasus: My Pick
In my personal experience, I find the Pegasus to be the superior daily trainer. It’s a tad lighter, a bit more nimble, and honestly, a bit more enjoyable to run in. Its versatility makes it a solid choice, catering to various types of training throughout my journey.
However, if the concept of a shoe that offers a bit more substance than the Pegasus appeals to you, then the Vomero is likely the way to go. I believe you’d find satisfaction in it as a daily trainer, especially if you appreciate a touch more shoe during your runs.
Vomero vs Pegasus: Midsole
It’s interesting to note that the Vomero 17 features a dual-density midsole, incorporating ZoomX on top and Cushlon 3.0 right below it. The use of ZoomX is noteworthy, and it’s something that people have been expressing interest in for the Pegasus.
This desire for ZoomX in the Pegasus has roots traced back to the original Pegasus Turbo, which boasted a dual-density midsole with ZoomX placed over React foam.
ZoomX is indeed Nike’s premium race foam, renowned for its use in high-performance models like the Invincible, Vaporfly, and Alpha Fly. The fact that it’s paired with Cushlon 3.0, a new formulation of a classic Nike foam, in the Vomero 17’s dual-density midsole is a noteworthy combination.
With ZoomX in the mix, the Vomero 17 delivers a pillowy soft sensation as soon as you slide your foot in, staying true to the long-standing description Nike has associated with the Vomero.
This dual-density midsole setup not only offers a softer feel on top but also contributes to an overall durable and stable midsole, with the Cushlon layer playing a crucial role in providing stability and support. It’s a clever combination that balances softness and durability in the midsole construction.
The Pegasus 40 is the last performance shoe featuring a full React midsole. React, being an older foam, is gradually being phased out from Nike’s performance shoe lineup.
In the Pegasus 40, there are two distinct Zoom Air units, one under the heel and one under the forefoot, a departure from the Vomero, which used to have these units but no longer does in the Vomero 17.
This dual setup adds a touch more pop and energy return to the ride, compensating for React’s reputation as a somewhat dull foam that lacks excitement.
Vomero vs Pegasus: Which is more stable?
It’s reassuring to hear that both shoes offer a similar sense of stability. Despite the Vomero having a softer foam and a higher profile, it doesn’t come off as unstable. The combination of a broad base and foam side walls at the heel contributes to a stable feel, and personal experiences haven’t raised any red flags in terms of stability.
On the Pegasus side, its inherent stability comes from the firmer React foam in the midsole and a relatively lower profile compared to the Vomero.
So, stability doesn’t seem to be a concern with either shoe.
It’s interesting how both the Vomero and Pegasus share a similar overall geometry as daily training shoes. However, the Vomero stands out with its extra comfort, which becomes particularly noticeable during long runs.
This enhanced comfort is attributed to the substantially higher stack of foam and the softer layer of ZoomX foam on top, making the Vomero a standout choice for longer runs where cushioning is paramount.
If you’re a heel striker and have a tendency to snap through onto your forefoot, the comfort difference between the Vomero and Pegasus becomes quite noticeable during runs. The Vomero, with its design and cushioning, stands out as a notably more comfortable option for individuals with this specific running style.
When you hit the road in the Vomero, the impact absorption kicks in with the very soft ZoomX when striking, but that’s where ZoomX stops. The transition is smoothly handed over to the firmer Cushlon, which takes charge of propelling you forward, creating a well-rounded running experience.
The Vomero is certainly a bit softer forefoot, but overall, the Pegasus is still certainly a very comfortable shoe just for mooching around in on easy runs.
Interestingly, the Vomero finds its sweet spot for many runners as it strikes a balance between the more traditional feel of the Pegasus and the extravagance of the Invincible, catering to a diverse range of preferences.
It’s common for people to draw comparisons between the Vomero and the Pegasus Turbo, but I want to clarify that the Vomero 17 is not like the Pegasus Turbo. In reality, the Vomero is a considerably heavier and less responsive shoe, clearly tailored more towards easy, comfortable running rather than the speed-oriented characteristics of the Pegasus Turbo.
The Pegasus 40 isn’t uncomfortable by any means, but it does have less foam under the forefoot compared to the Vomero. The React midsole is slightly firmer, resulting in a bit more ground feel, especially during those long runs when you’re aiming for a relaxed, easy pace.
Despite React being a firmer foam, the Pegasus benefits from the inclusion of Zoom Air units. As a forefoot striker, you can feel a satisfying pop from the Air Zoom unit in the forefoot, particularly during toe-off.
Surprisingly, when I ran in both shoes simultaneously, the comfort of the Pegasus underfoot caught me off guard. While one might assume the Vomero would be a significantly more comfortable choice due to the ZoomX foam and higher stack, the difference in comfort isn’t as substantial as expected.
Vomero vs Pegasus: Which is more versatile?
The Pegasus 40 takes an intriguing turn here…
In terms of versatility, I’d say the Pegasus 40 offers a bit more snap, providing a quicker transition when running at a faster pace. You get a slightly faster transition from the shoe when you’re running quickly and I think it firms up a little bit more under the forefoot in quite a good way.
While it may not deliver a lot of bounce back, it does facilitate a relatively fast turnover, making it suitable for faster efforts and adding a touch of responsiveness to the overall running experience.
While the Vomero 17 might offer a bit more bounce underfoot due to the ZoomX foam in the midsole, the Pegasus 40 takes the lead in terms of snappiness and agility.
So, if you want a shoe for those short, hard efforts, the Pegasus seems to have a slight advantage over the Vomero. It’s lighter, has a firmer feel, and gives a sense that you can easily turn your legs over for quick bursts.
However, when it comes to sustaining a good pace over longer distances, the Vomero 17 takes the lead. Its extra bounce, courtesy of the ZoomX foam, and added comfort make it a more favorable choice for longer runs.
If you want shoes to go really fast in, check out these great running shoes for speed.
Vomero vs Pegasus: Upper
Examining the uppers, the Vomero 17 features an engineered mesh upper with substantial padding around the heel and a robust internal heel counter.
The Pegasus 40, with its mesh upper, follows a similar design, boasting ample padding around the heel and tongue, presenting a comparable look at the back of the shoe to the Vomero.
While both shoes have impressive designs, the Pegasus 40’s upper stands out as one of Nike’s best. However, in direct comparison with the Vomero 17, the Pegasus’s upper excels in conforming and wrapping around your foot, providing a snug feel. On the other hand, the Vomero’s upper, when your foot slides in, seems to encompass your foot, creating a slightly different sensation during wear.
I tested both shoes in my normal size which is a US 9 and found that both the Vomero 17 and the Pegasus 40 fit well. No concerns about the fit were noted, with sufficient room in the forefoot and a non-narrow feel in either shoe. Additionally, both shoes provide a good hold around the midfoot and heel.
However, in terms of lockdown, it seems the Pegasus takes the lead, offering a more secure feel compared to the Vomero.
Also, I have no problem with width and the upper sits nicely on the top of my foot.
As a general recommendation, I would recommend you stick to your regular running shoe size for both the Vomero and the Pegasus 40 seems to be the way to go.
Breathability-wise, I think that the Vomero tends to run slightly hotter than the Pegasus. However, neither of them stands out as the coolest or most breathable shoe. If you live in a very hot and humid environment, then maybe the Vomero in particular might start to feel a bit hot.
Overall, both shoes seem to be on par in terms of breathability, with room for improvement in very warm conditions.
Vomero vs Pegasus: Outsole
Examining the outsoles, the Vomero 17 features a waffle tread outsole with large segments covering most of the shoe’s bottom half. The substantial rubber layer instills confidence in terms of durability, and grip has proven to be satisfactory.
Similarly, the Pegasus 40 has a comparable waffle outsole design with a slightly different pattern and a bit more rubber coverage. The thickness of the rubber layer is on par with the Vomero, ensuring both durability and reliable grip.
Overall, there doesn’t seem to be much to distinguish between the two shoes in terms of outsole performance—they both offer robust construction, durability, and good grip.
If you’re looking for cushioned shoes mainly for daily training and easy runs:
- Vomero: Offers a slightly softer and more comfortable ride, especially under the forefoot.
- Pegasus: Does a good job for easy runs up to 10K, miles, and 5-mile runs.
For long runs, especially in marathon training:
- Vomero: Preferred for regular 20K runs during marathon training.
- Pegasus: Also suitable for longer distances but might not match the comfort level of Vomero.
- Not a huge disparity between the two shoes.
- Price: Pegasus is significantly cheaper, making it a notable advantage.
Versatility and use cases:
- Pegasus: Considered a do-it-all shoe, more versatile for speed work, and still comfortable for long distances.
- Vomero: Ideal as a comfortable cruiser for easy runs, especially for those seeking a softer feel.
- Not recommended to buy both for a rotation; consider pairing Vomero with a lighter, nimbler shoe for speed work.
Expectations from the Vomero:
- Ride: Not as lively and responsive as Pegasus Turbo; offers a comfortable cushion for easy and long runs but lacks the spectacular softness of shoes like the Invincible.
- Vomero: Great for easy and long runs, but not as versatile as Pegasus.
- Pegasus: Versatile enough for both easy days and speed work; slightly better balance of weight and stack height.
Those are my thoughts on the Nike Vomero vs. Pegasus. Ultimately, the choice between the Vomero 17 and the Pegasus 40 depends on your specific needs. If you prioritize comfort for longer distances, the Vomero might be your go-to.
On the other hand, if you’re looking for a more versatile option that handles various types of runs, Pegasus, with its affordability, could be the better choice. Consider your preferences and running routine to determine which shoe suits you best.
Thanks for making it to the end of this comparison, and I’ll see you in the next one 🙂